We all love a good villain. After all, it’s infinitely easier to point a self-righteous finger at the street magicians, the grinning politicians, and the hyper-filtered influencers peddling their shiny novelties than it is to look at ourselves in the mirror and see more than a bit of them in ourselves. But the uncomfortable, foundational truth of the modern era is that these con artists don’t run the world because they possess any genuine magic. They run it because we hired them to do so.
Our current cultural milieu has resulted in what can only be described as a Charlatans’ Paradise. It’s an attention-based economy built entirely on our own spiritual and intellectual deficit. We have countless grifters, at the corporate level and online, thriving directly on our innate human propensity to seek something to believe in. We’ve allowed several major corporations to systematically commodify every waking second of our existence. For some reason, for the sake of convenience, we allow this to happen.
Naturally, with our attention constantly harvested and most opportunities for serendipity lost, we’re left fundamentally starved for meaning. And even with the constant flow of information and content, we’re starving for context and purpose. Since our hunger for these things is never fully satiated, most of us are now addicted to platforms more than happy to keep us consuming at any cost.
But we’re not the unwilling participants in this modern travesty of a technopoly (thanks Neil Postman for this term) we so often claim to be. Most of us have eagerly surrendered to the illusion because the alternative, the unglamorous and often agonizing work of finding authentic purpose, is simply too difficult. The charlatan’s greatest trick isn’t merely deception. Their cleverness comes in recognizing our desperate demand for a shortcut, then happily supplying the algorithm-powered treasure map. That is, for a modest subscription fee, of course.
The greatest weapon in the Charlatan’s arsenal is our own intellectual arrogance. Our collective gullibility belies a profound hubris that blinds us to our vulnerabilities. We look at the victims of the latest wellness cult or financial grift and smugly think ourselves completely immune. But this is the internal rhetoric of our ego. We want to believe we’re the hyper-rational protagonists of our own stories, somehow invulnerable to the follies that befall everyone else. We desperately cling to our unexamined convictions because they offer a comforting script of control in what’s an otherwise chaotic, deeply unpredictable universe.
Don’t believe what the prediction markets tell you, either, because they’re rigged. The very basic premise of these markets is simply betting on what people think is going to happen. There may be some statistical probability underlying some of the odds, perhaps, but the vast majority of what tips the scales is sheer mob sentiment going one way or the other. This is why we have a representative democracy in America; mob rule is a bad idea, and prediction markets should be a clear sign that life should not be treated like a casino where the house always wins.
Unfortunately, sheer raw intelligence isn’t a vaccine against deception. In fact, the smarter you think you are, the easier you are to hack. Our modern digital echo chambers are meant to coddle us into submission, speaking to us in a highly personalized dialect of validation, systematically shielding us from any dissenting perspective that might puncture our fragile, inflated sense of self. Within these algorithmically sealed bubbles, our hubris grows completely unchecked.
This is an intentional and very anti-human goal of the Big Tech companies, to keep us coming back to be bombarded with more advertising and more brand messaging. They’re purposely trying to keep our eyes locked on their screens while simultaneously obscuring our peripheral vision to what’s actually happening; the more attention they can suck from us, the higher their valuations can be set at, and their balance sheets rejoice as the rest of us try to scrounge together pocket change for gas money to get home from work! Or perhaps for ramen noodles so your family doesn’t starve that night. Both have actually happened to me in my early thirties. And while I’ve come a long way in the past few years, it’s much worse now for most of us.
With the benefit of carefully crafted and engineered user experiences, modern con artists need no soapbox to shout at the masses. They simply slip into our curated feeds, adopting the language of the echo chambers which stand to be most vulnerable to their pitches. Just tailor these illusions to our pride and exploit our defense mechanisms, and you can sell our own unearned confidence right back to us at a premium!
So, we’re currently drowning in the aesthetics of the void. Our world is utterly saturated with images and narratives that obsessively glorify the external and the ephemeral. But the modern con artist rarely looks like a villain; in fact, they can look like a perfectly lit aspiration. Influencers no longer just sell products, but meticulously curated lifestyles. These siren songs of superficiality they broadcast are nearly impossible to resist because they’re algorithmically tuned to echo our deepest insecurities.
Modern social media influencers create a flawless digital mirage of a life that’s always just slightly out of reach, a pristine horizon that consistently recedes the closer we try to approach it. We’ve willingly allowed our esteem to be measured in likes and followers, and we demand that our success be visible in the material symbols we accumulate. Even spiritual depth has been co-opted, with gurus offering supernatural enlightenment at a premium price point.
The result is that we live in a society left to trap ourselves in an inherently absurd Sisyphean endeavor, forever pushing a boulder up a hill seeking instant gratification, leaving ourselves perpetually unsatisfied and craving the next thing that promises to fill the void. The ultimate absurdity is that while we’re busy chasing these superficial ideals, we completely bypass the genuine experiences and connections that offer actual fulfillment. We trade the messy reality of living for a perfectly filtered photograph of a hollow existence.
Now, if the system is broken, the rhetoric manipulative, and the aesthetics completely hollow, how do we respond? You can’t outsmart the con on its own terms, and you certainly can’t optimize your way out of it. The only philosophically sound response is a radical act of refusal. But this refusal isn’t about turning to cynical withdrawal or retreating into embittered isolation. It involves making a conscious, daily decision to opt out of the con entirely.
From my own semi-isolated vantage point in rural Vermont, observing the ceaseless grifting from a distance with my wife Emily, it seems opting out of the attention economy can be a surprising source of strength. I’ve deliberately chosen to view other human beings as ends in themselves, rather than resources to be mined or tools to be wielded for personal gain. I choose the grueling work of presenting my messy, authentic (which feels like a dirty word at this point) self over the cheap, frictionless ease of artifice. It beats the alternative of wasting my life following the lead of everyone else running themselves into the ground chasing abstractions.
But recognizing the sheer, unadulterated absurdity of our modern condition shouldn’t make us despair. I’ll admit, the past few years I’ve felt a bit hopeless in interfacing much with the current world at all while seeking solutions for our modern troubles. Still, when you finally see the Charlatans’ Paradise for what it is, the world’s folly is on full display. Our ultimate rebellion doesn’t mean fighting with the street magicians. Simply walk out of their theater, accept the absurdity with a self-educated sense of humor, and progressively build a life grounded in actual, durable substance.
So, opting out of the con just means turning your brain back on and asking those questions you thought were stupid. There are no stupid questions here, even if they’re seemingly mindlessly daft. In any case, don’t set out to answer them all. Instead, learn how to ask better ones. The last thing the Charlatans want is for people to actually question what they’re doing, after all. It’s the only realistic chance to cure the technopoly-driven delusion that’s causing us to rot our brains, bodies, and souls into oblivion. You don’t even have to move to the woods to enact this rebellion; my wife and I live just off of a state highway, believe it or not. Just start asking questions, weird and off-putting as they might be, then don’t stop following your curiosity. (L2NIP)
~ Amelia Desertsong, June 3, 2026
Postscript: This essay is a redux of a formerly published essay that I stripped for parts, then added a lot of material to make it more relevant to a 2026 audience.


One response to “Opting Out of the Con (Redux)”
[…] (This inevitably became “Opting Out of the Con,” the first entry in my ill-fated Chronicles of Absurdia project… at least, eventually, something came of this.) […]